Podcasts

Powerful Patens in the Anglo-Saxon Medical Tradition and Exeter Book Riddle 48

Powerful Patens in the Anglo-Saxon Medical Tradition and Exeter Book Riddle 48


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Powerful Patens in the Anglo-Saxon Medical Tradition and Exeter Book Riddle 48

By Megan Cavell

Neophilologus (June 2016)

Abstract: This article discusses Exeter Book Riddle 48 in light of its proposed solutions. While commonly solved as either “chalice” or “paten,” I argue that the riddle points toward the latter solution (OE husel-disc). This riddle is usually read in relation to its counterpart, Riddle 59, which scholarly consensus solves as “chalice” (OE calic or husel-fæt). However, Riddle 48 should be analysed in its own right, especially given evidence from the medical tradition that prescribes writing on patens and performing psalms and other prayers over them in order to cure sickness. It is to this practice and to the psalms that Riddle 48 gestures in its use of the term galdorcwide (incantation), as well as the direct quotation that appeals to God to heal the speaker.

Introduction: Like many of the riddles in the tenth-century Exeter Book, Riddle 48 has had its fair share of proposed solutions. Although it is most commonly interpreted as a sacramental vessel—either a chalice or paten—it has also been read as a book or finger ring, and analysed briefly in relation to coins, bells and brooches. While all of these readings acknowledge the high-status nature of the object depicted in Riddle 48, this article argues that evidence which supports solving the riddle as a husel-disc (paten) can be found in the Anglo-Saxon medical tradition.

Read more of Megan Cavell’s work on The Riddle Ages


Watch the video: Commentary: Riddle 47 or 45 - Exeter Book Riddles in Modern English (July 2022).


Comments:

  1. Orville

    oh ... how lovely ...

  2. Maris

    You are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

  3. Nicholas

    Thank you very much

  4. Jarlath

    The blog is just super, I will recommend it to my friends!

  5. Artaxiad

    It is a pity that I will not be able to participate in the discussion now. I don't have the information I need. But this topic interests me very much.



Write a message